[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Orekit Users] new orekit version
- To: <orekit-users@orekit.org>
- Subject: Re: [Orekit Users] new orekit version
- From: Evan Ward <evan.ward@nrl.navy.mil>
- Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2016 09:40:56 -0500
- Cc: Bill Immerman <bill@immerman-inc.com>
- In-reply-to: <6FFACF9A-74FC-4D2C-8901-32BF01062848@immerman-inc.com>
- References: <FA7A9ACD-87A1-4DE8-92E8-8F5C6E5438CB@immerman-inc.com> <56BC81E4.6090602@nrl.navy.mil> <6FFACF9A-74FC-4D2C-8901-32BF01062848@immerman-inc.com>
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1
Hi,
A colleague of mine is trying to verify the PGP signatures on the
recently released Orekit 7.1 sources. I've tried as well and it seems
that the signature file orekit-7.1-sources.jar.asc doesn't match
orekit-7.1-sources.zip. Am I comparing the right files or is there some
mistake with the signature?
Best Regards,
Evan
On 02/11/2016 09:25 AM, Bill Immerman wrote:
> I probably just downloaded it with gpg from some default keyserver. When you try to verify with gpg and don’t have a matching key, it tells you what the key it’s looking for is, and I usually just request that key with —recv-key option.
>
> The error I got this time was different … it said it was a bad key.
>
> Bill
>
>> On Feb 11, 2016, at 7:43 AM, Evan Ward <evan.ward@nrl.navy.mil> wrote:
>>
>> Where did you find the public key? I haven't actually tried to verify a
>> PGP signature before.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Evan
>>
>>
>> On 02/11/2016 02:25 AM, William Immerman wrote:
>>> Hey Evan—
>>>
>>> You might want to note to whoever maintains repository/website that the signature file for the new orekit version seems to be named wrong (orekit-7.1-sources.jar.asc instead of orekit-7.1-sources.zip.asc), and more importantly, it indicates a bad signature when I try to verify it. The MD5 checksum on the downloaded file matches the website’s published value.
>>>
>>> Please let me know if the signature was wrong, or if the published source zip file is suspect?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Bill
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>